When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. On September 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the victim D, who is an apartment security guard, for the reason that he/she had the victim take a position to enter his/her own house and promise at the C apartment guard room around the south of Sep. 21, 2016; (b) taken the victim’s floor by getting him/her out of the guards room by getting him/her out of the guards room; and (c) took the victim’s walk by getting him/her out of the guards room by getting him/her out of the guards; and (d) interfered with the victim’s guard duties by force over about 30 minutes, such as opening the entrance door via drinking and outing.

2. On October 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the same place as indicated in the preceding paragraph on October 11, 2016, at around 23:15, and at the same time as indicated in the preceding paragraph, whether the Defendant, who interfered with the business on October 11, 2016, sent the victim the phone number of the autonomous chairperson to the civil petitioner.

“Abbucks and knenes caused the victim’s chest by drinking, and interfered with the victim’s security service for about 30 minutes by force by force, such as driving bucks and kneebbbbbs and knenes, driving bucks of the victim’s bucks by hand, driving bucks with hand, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the provisions of the Act and subordinate statutes to cut off theCCTV video;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under the main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the costs of lawsuit

1. The Defendant alleged that he/she committed a crime on September 21, 2016.

In addition, since the criminal time of the defendant is after the time of the victim's work, it has interfered with the victim's work.

shall not be deemed to exist.

2. Determination

A. “Duties” subject to the protection of interference with duties under the Criminal Act is an occupation or occupation.