약정금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of this court's judgment concerning this case is as follows. This court's judgment concerning this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is the same as that of the court of first instance except to dismiss or add part of the court of first instance as mentioned below 2.
(1) The reasoning for the Defendant’s appeal is not significantly different from the argument in the first instance court, and the fact-finding and judgment in the first instance court are justifiable even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court was presented in the evidence adopted by the first instance court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 2, 201).
this subsection shall be filled by the following:
On February 17, 2017, the Defendant purchased the instant C Account under the Plaintiff’s name and operated the content of illegal pornography and illegal discussions in the Round. However, on June 2017, 2017, on the ground that the Plaintiff owned a large number of accounts to C, it became impossible to use the instant C Account due to the Plaintiff’s non-Vitalization (suspension to prevent the user from using the account).
(2) On 14th 14th 14th 201, the first instance court’s decision “2. 15th 2017. 13th 2017.”
(3) With respect to 5 pages of the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff 5 pages 13 and 5 pages from the judgment of the court of first instance. Accordingly, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit as follows.
As to this, the plaintiff changed the investment contract of this case to the profit payment contract of this case after 2 days from the date of the investment contract of this case (In particular, the plaintiff asserts that the investment contract of this case was changed to Paragraph 7 of the revenue payment contract of this case). The plaintiff asserts that the defendant agreed to guarantee the principal to the plaintiff even if the account was non-viivated as in this case.
Therefore, according to the overall purport of the statement and arguments of No. 1 through 3, No. 7, No. 12, and No. 4, the investment amount, etc. shall be specified when the account to purchase the investment contract of this case is finalized.