The judgment below

Although examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the application of Article 48 of the Private School Act, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

The argument that the court below erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the illegality of the submission order of audit data of this case, omission of judgment, hearing failure, and violation of the rules of evidence is alleged in the court of final appeal that the defendant did not use it as a ground for appeal or make it an object of judgment ex officio, and it does not constitute a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.