On August 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the night building intrusion at the Changwon District Court's Jinju branch, etc., and the judgment was finalized on the 25th of the same month.

At around 01:30 on August 13, 2016, the Defendant took part in the side and the left part of the victim, such as the victim, etc., and took part in the side of the victim, such as the victim, etc., by taking part in the case where the victim D (here, 28 years of age) who is the wife of the Defendant took part in the lending of KRW 6 million from the bond company prior to the towing, and has been in dispute with the victim, which was about the lending of KRW 6 million from the bond company. After taking part in the face of the victim due to drinking, the Defendant took part in the drinking part of the victim, etc., and took part in the drinking part, which is a dangerous thing in the kitchen (No. 1, total number 24 centimeters, 13 centimeters in length on the day of the kitchen, 13 centimeters in length) and took part in the upper part once.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted injury on the victim, such as the left-hand frame and the heart of the left-hand body in need of treatment for about nine weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. A medical certificate of injury, and medical records;

1. One excessive (No. 1) prosecutor who has been seized is sought to confiscate it, but this is deemed to be an object owned by the victim, and thus, it shall not be confiscated;

of the Corporation.

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (Attachment of judgments), previous convictions, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing summary orders;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the latter part of Articles 37 and 39(1) of the Criminal Act, which are dangerous objects, are to inflict bodily injury on the victim who is his spouse, and the nature of the crime is not very good, and the degree of injury suffered by the victim is also very important, and the defendant seems to have shown that he did not seriously reflect his criminal act by verbal abuse, etc. after the crime of this case, and the defendant and the victim are between the defendant and the victim.