도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 20 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power” On December 15, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court’s subdivision support on December 15, 2015. On March 16, 2018, the Daejeon High Court sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of KRW 5 years for a term of imprisonment with prison labor for a term of 3 years for a crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a minor under the age of 13) (ab
【Criminal Facts】 On July 30, 2019, at around 23:30, the Defendant driven a vehicle E with an options in the state of alcohol 0.091% under the influence of alcohol from around 300 meters to the front road of the Defendant’s house located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.
Accordingly, the defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Notification of the results of drinking control;
1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification during the period of suspension of execution of sentence), application of statutes concerning judgment;
1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: A majority of criminal records have been included in the sentence, and the previous facts are four times or more, the defendant seems to be against his mistake during the period of suspension of execution, the defendant's disposal of the vehicle, and the defendant's disposal of the vehicle again, the defendant's vicarious driving at the designated Eup, and the defendant's vicarious driving of the vehicle was 300 meters away from the above C to the house, and the distance was not set, the blood alcohol concentration is less than 0.1%, and all the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, criminal records, criminal records, the circumstances of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.