If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

1. On December 27, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The sales contract amount is KRW 2,300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00

The defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay even if he received the money from the complainant as the price for sale in lots.

As above, the defendant deceivings the complainant and received 2.3 million won from the complainant, namely, the E Bank Account Number F in the name of the defendant.

2. On January 4, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the complainant D, at the same place as the former Paragraph (a) at the same time as “Around January 4, 2018, to the effect that “The purchase price shall be fash.................. 1.5 million won borrowed previously, including interest, shall be repaid KRW 2.3 million on January 16, 2018.”

The defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay even if he received the money from the complainant as the price for sale in lots.

As above, the Defendant deceivings the complainant and received 1.5 million won from the complainant to the E bank account in the name of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the contents of G dialogue and the details of transactions statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;