2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. D received the assessment of the instant forest land on January 18, 1935.

B. On November 25, 1993, the defendant completed the registration of initial ownership relating to the forest of this case.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1 and 2 (including additional numbers), Eul's statements and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The owner of the instant forest land is the Plaintiff, since the Plaintiff’s Party E’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion purchased the instant forest land from D and thereafter donated it to the Plaintiff.

However, inasmuch as the Defendant completed the registration of ownership preservation on the forest of this case based on a false certificate of guarantee and written confirmation, the Defendant filed for the registration of ownership transfer for the restoration of authentic title.

B. Since there is no evidence to deem that the Plaintiff’s headquarters E purchased the forest of this case from D, the Plaintiff’s assertion on a different premise is without merit without having to examine further.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.