However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 18, 2013, while the Defendant was under the influence of 0.054% of blood alcohol concentration, the Defendant sustained from the victim E with the injury of crypian cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp c.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the proviso to Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes ( mutually among the violations of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents);

1. Selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act and the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and (2), and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishments of two crimes);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant has been sentenced to a fine twice due to a drunk driving, with no record of the crime except that, the violation

1. An order to provide community service or attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;