2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by Defendant FF stock companies.

purport.

A. Defendant E is the actual operator of Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”), and Defendant D is a person who served as Defendant F’s managing director.

B. (1) Plaintiff A and Plaintiff C are married with each other, and Plaintiff B and Plaintiff C are children of Plaintiff A and Plaintiff C.

See The Plaintiffs remitted each amount stated in the “amount” as of the date stated below to Defendant D’s account, each of which was Defendant F’s executive director.

(3) Evidence 10, 100, 10, 20. 10, 20. 8, 20. 10, 20. 10, 10, 200, 10, 200, 20. 10, 200, 2000, 230, 300, 30. 110, 200, 30. 10, 200, 30. 10, 200, 110, 200, 200, 30. 10. 10, 200, 100, 200. 10, 110, 200, 100, 100, 100, 200, 100, 200, 100, 2000, 10, 205, 2010

2. Judgment on the plaintiffs' primary claims

A. In full view of the purport of Gap evidence No. 11-1-4 of the judgment on the cause of the claim and the whole arguments, defendant E, who is a substantial operator of defendant F and has the authority to represent the defendant F, agreed that if the plaintiffs paid money to the defendant F, the defendant F shall invest the money in other investment sources and return the money to the plaintiffs within one month the sum of the principal of the money paid by the plaintiffs to other investment sources and the interest of the 6% or 7% of the amount paid by the plaintiffs to the other investment sources, and the plaintiffs remitted money to the defendant D's account as stated in the above Paragraph 1-2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant F shall be the plaintiffs.