Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of criminal facts regarding attempted crime among the facts charged in the instant case.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the

Meanwhile, although the prosecutor appealed to the entire judgment of the court below, the part of the conviction did not state the grounds for appeal, and the appellate brief does not state the grounds for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.