beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.06.27 2013고합72

강도치상

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for two years and six months, respectively.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 1, 2013, at the house of Defendant B located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on March 1, 2013, the Defendants conspired to raise the living expenses by cutting money and goods from female returning home in the middle of Yongsan-gu and raising them to raise the living expenses. At around 00:30 on the same day, the Defendants saw the above house, Yongsan-gu, Mapo-gu, and Seoul Station, and volunteer-gu as a member of the crime. On the same day, around 05:28 on the same day, the Defendants discovered the victim He (the Ha, 30 years of age) entering the bus as a runway, and followed the degree of 300 years of age from the bus of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

At around 05:35 on the same day, the Defendants reported the network at the entrance of the dial stairs in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Defendant A was the victim's kick, and Defendant A was the victim's knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife, sound knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife, and continued to prevent the victim from resisting the knife with his knife with his knife, the victim's knife with his knife with his knife.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly taken the property amounting to KRW 1.65 million at the market price owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (as of the fourth trial date)

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness H’s legal statement;

1. Relevant provisions concerning the facts constituting an offense and the Defendants who choose the penalty: Articles 334 (2) and (1), and 333 of the Criminal Act;

2. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

3. Defendants subject to suspended sentence: The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the “consected sentence”),

1. The scope of recommendations on the sentencing criteria: The general standards for robbery shall be two years and six months to four years (the determination of types) of imprisonment.