2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment on the cause of the claim is as indicated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts: (a) the scope of liability for damages from the 12th to 9th 14th 14th tier of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) the scope of the “indemnites” and “indemnites” are as follows. Accordingly, this part is cited in accordance

[4] (4) Where a party to a transaction of real estate subject to the limitation of liability for damages delegates a broker with the brokerage of real estate transactions, the broker has a duty to investigate and confirm the relationship of rights of the object of brokerage in accordance with the purport of delegation, and if the broker violates his/her duty of care, he/she shall be liable for compensation for damages arising therefrom. However, the broker shall not be deemed to fully belong to the broker and the transaction party shall be deemed to be out of his/her responsibility. Thus, in determining the scope of compensation for damages incurred to the broker by failing to perform his/her duty of investigation and confirmation of the transaction relation in arranging real estate transactions, in determining the scope of compensation for damages incurred to the broker by failing to perform his/her duty of investigation and verification as to the transaction relation, if the broker is deemed to have neglected to investigate and confirm the transaction relation, and the occurrence and expansion thereof has caused damage, it shall be deemed to have been caused by negligence on the part of the broker, which is the victim, and

(See Supreme Court Decision 2012Da69654 Decided November 29, 2012). The following circumstances, i.e., the Plaintiff, also confirmed the copy of the register of the leased building of this case.