2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) and 1) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”).

D) 6,411 motor vehicle spare parts, total sum 2,197 km (hereinafter referred to as “instant cargo”).

2) The Plaintiff, the insurer, and the Plaintiff, entered into a maritime cargo insurance contract (securities number E) with respect to the instant cargo, with the insurance amount of USD 98,481.54, as a condition for the delivery of the instant cargo (FOB). (2) C concluded a maritime cargo insurance contract (securities number E) with the insured amount of USD 110.

B. 1) The Defendant, a company operating a port loading and unloading business, etc., shall operate a F Terminal in Busan. 2) C entered into a marine transportation contract with H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) with respect to the instant cargo through the transportation brokerage of G (G Inc.).

H delegated the maritime transport service to I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “I”).

3) The instant cargo is a container (number J, hereinafter “instant container”).

(C) At around 03:30 on November 9, 2016, K was loaded with another container in the F Terminal and transported to F Terminal operated by the Defendant. (c) At around 03:30 on November 9, 2016, the instant container fell into the ground and the instant container fell into the ground.

(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다). 2) 이 사건 사고로 이 사건 컨테이너 좌측 및 천정 패널이 구부러지고 움푹 팼으며, 우측 및 천정이 부분적으로 뜯겼고, 이 사건 화물이 다양하게 손상되었다. 육안으로 손상품과 정상품을 분리할 수 없고, C의 품질부서에서 정상품을 확인하는 데 수개월이 걸리지만, 기능을 보장할 수 없으며, 소요 비용이 많이 들어 현실적으로 구분하기가 불가능하였다. 3) 이 사건 사고 직후 이 사건 화물 전부가 당초 목적대로 사용할 수 없는 것으로 판단되어 전량 폐기되었다.

The plaintiff goes against C on April 5, 2017 according to the insurance contract.