마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
1. On February 6, 2014, the summary of each of the facts charged in the instant case and the reflect gambling prosecutor were not a handler of narcotics, but the Defendant purchased approximately 0.7g of 300,000 won from F to 300,000 won (the charges No. 1); ② on February 10, 2014, the Defendant received approximately 0.09g of philopon (the charges No. 2009gopon) from E to 30,000,000 (the charges No. 30,000,000) from 30,000,000,000,000 won (the charges No. 20,000,000,000) from 30,000,000 won (the charges No. 4,000,000,000) from 30,000,000).
In this regard, the defendant/defense counsel did not deal with philophones at the time of signing that there was a fact that the defendant had met E at the time and place stated in the facts charged.
The argument is asserted.
2. In full view of the following circumstances recognized by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone was proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant did not purchase phiphones from E, and that the facts charged are beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant was unaware of not administering phiphones from “H”, “Jel”, and “Lel”.
It is difficult to see that the defendant committed the crime of this case on the sole basis of the fact that he was sentenced to a sentence in 2011 due to the medication of a phiphone, etc. that led to nine times, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
① As evidence corresponding to each of the facts charged in this case, E’s investigative stage and statements in this court are made.
In this regard, E has set many directions before and after 2014.