beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.04.08 2014고단1895

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 6, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

Around January 5, 2009, the Defendant, at the office of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) (hereinafter “D”), told the victim E to enter into a contract for the transportation of aggregate with the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”), and concluded a contract for the transportation of aggregate with the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”). The Defendant entered into a contract for the transportation of aggregate with the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) within the territory of the Republic of Korea for six years. The Defendant entered into a contract for the transportation of aggregate with the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”). At the scene of six years, the Defendant entered into a contract for the transportation of the brine-do in the construction site at D, with the amount of KRW 80 million,000,000,000,000 in a line from February 14, 2009.”

However, even though the fact that GF operated by the Defendant is not normally permitted to extract aggregate, the Defendant, despite being aware that F does not normally obtain permission to extract aggregate, prepared a contract for the transportation of aggregate as if F had the right to extract aggregate from the field of the field, and the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to allow the victim to operate the brin restaurant.

On January 5, 2009, the Defendant received a total of KRW 22 million from the victim to the account of community credit cooperatives under the name of H Co., Ltd. in which the Defendant actually operated, and received KRW 42 million from each of the above accounts on January 8, 2009.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

"2014 Highest 3496"

1. On October 31, 2010, the Defendant concluded a subcontract with the victim KK operated by the Defendant in Songpa-gu Seoul, the Defendant concluded a contract with the Defendant K company located in Songpa-gu, Seoul, on the following grounds: “A false statement was made to the effect that the Defendant would pay the price to the Defendant for the construction of reinforced concrete in order to put him/her into a company’s company building on the land outside and two parcels of Yongsan-si.”

However, the defendant at the time.