At around 23:30 on June 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the police officers on the 112 report, such as assaulting those who were under drinking alcohol; and (b) obstructed the lawful performance of official duties concerning the handling of reports, etc. by the police officers, by assaulting the police officers on the ground that the police officers assigned to the Seoul Central Franc Police Station D police box, E assistantF prevented the Defendant from committing the Defendant’s act; and (c) continuously arrested the police officers in the act of carrying out the patrol for the foregoing reason, and continuously arrested the F in the act of carrying out the patrol for the said reason, the horses of the F would face on the part of the patrol; and (d) assaulting the police officers on the 112 Incident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements concerning G and F;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the grounds for sentencing choice of imprisonment are against the defendant. However, while there are many criminal records against the defendant, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the following circumstances: the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.