However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

From July 31, 2013, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Defendant’s wife B in his or her name, and traded household checks.

around August 20, 2016, the Defendant issued one copy of the household check in the name of B, which was named as “E”, “5,000,000 won” in the D office operated by the Defendant in Suwon-gu, Busan, and presented a total amount of KRW 25,00,000,00 each holder of a household check within the period for presentation, as stated in Nos. 3, 5, and 8 of the Criminal List No. 3, 5,000, as well as the issuance of one copy of the household check in the name of B, which was named as “E”, “5,00,000 won”, but each holder did not receive a suspension of deposit or transaction.

around September 7, 2016, the Defendant issued one copy of a family check in the name of B, “F”, “5,00,000 won”, “G” and “G”, “5,000,000 won”, and the date of issuance of the check, within the payment period, each holder issued one copy of a family check in the name of B, which is named as “F”, “F”, “5,000,000,000” and “F”, and presented one copy of the family check in the name of B, which is named as “F”, “F”, “5,00,000,000”, and presented it within the payment period. However, each holder did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 422"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigative report (including specifying a suspect and submission of data), and each accusation (including a copy of a check), "2017 Highest 514";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on household checks and household checks;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Regulation of Illegal Check of Punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the amount of a check, the reason for which the sentence is not due, is not small, is unfavorable.

However, the fact that the defendant recognizes the facts charged and seriously reflects the facts charged, and the defendant is running his business normally.