When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2019. 1. 19. 18:13경 오산시 B아파트 C동 지하주차장에서, “남자가 여자를 때린다”는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 오산경찰서 D지구대 소속 경찰관 경장 E으로부터 신분증을 제시할 것을 요구받자 "씨발놈아 니가 경찰이야, 신분증 보여줘봐, 씨발 좆만한 새끼가 니가 양아치인지 뭔지 어떻게 알어, 주먹으로 한 대 친다"라고 욕을 하면서 삿대질을 하고, 경장 E의 가슴을 2회 밀치고 멱살을 잡아 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. At the time and place indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant said that the victim slope F, a police officer affiliated with the Osan Police Station D District D District D, was the Defendant’s bath and assault as well as the Defendant’s abusiveism and assault, and that the Defendant said the victim was “Iskhnhn, Iskhnhn, Iskhnhn, Iskhnhn, Iskhnhn, Iskhn

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Reports on investigation, and photographs of victims;

1. A investigation report (CCTV investigation) and CCTV video storage CD;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine for the crime, the choice of a punishment, and the relevant Article of the Criminal Act

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is deemed to have been committed by a police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report 112, and thus, the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime. The defendant has a record of being punished by a fine for violent crime in around 2005.

However, the defendant committed the crime of this case.