In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the above fine shall be paid on 100.

On February 1, 2015, at around 00:15, Defendants: (a) 20:15; (b) d headhouse in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu; (c) shotF, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Central Police Station E zone in Seoul, who was called to the scene after receiving 112 reports, expressed that they would compensate the Defendants for the drinking value and the chemical value and go to the house; (d) Defendant A is a person who is a major in law; (b) she will not go to the police room by telephone; and (c) Defendant B 1 took a bath to the above direction that “I am out, saw, us can see, and us will do so”; and (d) Defendant B 2 took a walk in the direction that "I am out, and me will do so. I am out,” followed Defendant B’s ring the 2nd floor of the said chest, and she sphere and walked the said chest.”

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly committed assault as above and interfered with the police officers’ legitimate execution of their duties concerning the handling of 112 reported duties and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each statement of G, H and F;

1. Application of documentary evidence photographic Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of fines (including the fact that the accused commits an error, the accused does not have any force to commit an offense for the same kind of crime, and the accused has any force to commit an accident while drinking alcohol, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;