특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)등
[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three years and by a fine of 50,00,000 won.
Defendant
A does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who served as the Director of the Korea Railroad Corporation (hereinafter “Corporation”) from April 2015 to January 4, 2016, and Defendant B is a person who served as the Director of the Korea Railroad Corporation from April 2014 to April 2015.
Defendant
D is a person who has served as the head of the Corporation's V Headquarters W from August 2013 to February 2015.
Defendant
C is a person who actually operated Y(hereinafter referred to as “Y”) while working as the director of the Ministry of Railroad Business in X.
Defendant
A, B, and D were deemed public officials, and were removed on October 2016.
1. From around April 2014, Defendant B performed the construction work of “A-AB 11-2 Section 11-2 Section 11-2 Section” (hereinafter “instant construction work”). However, from around April 2014, Defendant B performed the construction work of “A-AB 11-2 Section 11-2 Section 11.” (hereinafter “the instant railroad construction work”). However, from around April 2014, Defendant had been on duty as the Director of the V Headquarters Construction.
Defendant had been aware of before around 2014
C) A solicitation was received from C to arrange for the change design of the instant railroad construction; around October 10, 2015, around the Defendant’s residential premises located in the Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon Seodong apartment, the honorarium was issued KRW 12 million as the reward; and around April 1, 2016, five million in cash at a restaurant near Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yongsan-gu, Seoul.
Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe of 17 million won in total in relation to his duties.
2. From August 2013, Defendant D had the Corporation’s V Headquarters W division work as the Defendant from around August 2013.
On October 2014, the Defendant had been in office as the Director of the V Headquarters Construction Technology Co., Ltd., and had attempted to give a contract for the modification of the instant railroad construction work under the direction of C, who actually operates Y, to which C, would be in charge of the said construction work, and around October 10, 2015, the Defendant had tried to give a contract for the said modification.