However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:40 on June 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stated, at the office operated by the Defendant located in the Northern-si B, the husband D and the Defendant was called, “I will return to the hospital if I are in bad condition” while checking the status of the Defendant, and “I will return the victim to the hospital.” (b) I sent the victim’s left side bridge of F(37 years of age) on several hand, and sent the victim’s body to the victim’s body more than 5 days, and sent the victim’s body. (c) The Defendant left the left side side side of F(37 years of age) in need of treatment for about 5 days.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of fire officers' 119 mobilization and inflicted an injury on the victim at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene of injury and emergency medical services;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (the crime of this case is committed by assaulting first responders to the performance of official duties of fire officers and at the same time causing injuries to fire officers, and the nature of the crime is not good: Provided, That the crime is a contingent crime, the degree of injury to victims is minor, and the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding a fine, etc.);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act regarding community service order;