When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 19, 2015, at around 22:36, the Defendant: (a) boarded a taxi in front of the U.S. apartment located in the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si; (b) and (c) opened a road with a fluence while under the influence of alcohol; and (c) turned the fluence into the D zone located in the Sinsi-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si.

At this place, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to return home, and, without any justifiable reason, respondeded to the police officer E belonging to the above D District, “I must go to the police, spath, spath,” and “I shall go to spath, spath, spath, spath, spath, spath, spath,” and assaulted about five times on the part of the Defendant’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of B’s written laws and regulations;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Taking account of the fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the sentencing, and there is no criminal record other than once the fine is imposed.