However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 29, 2015, the Defendant was driving a D SP car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.163% in the section of approximately 3km from a place where it is impossible to identify the location located in the original ambling in the original ambi-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si to the front road of the video culture complex of the same Gu.

2. On October 29, 2015, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender due to the driving of drinking on the road in front of the “Cinematographic Culture Complex,” which is mainly located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, as described in paragraph (1), and was escorted to the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si Police Station guard, and the 12-time police station driven by E, who is a police officer belonging to the traffic management division, to the police officer assigned to the traffic management division, on the 12-time 12-time police officer assigned to the police officer assigned to the police officer assigned to the traffic management division, and was escorted to the 84-ro, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Police Station, 311,

The Defendant, at around 01:20 on the same day, said day, stated that “I will die, if I die, I will do so. I will do so.” On the back seat of the patrol vehicle in front of the modern department store located in the same Gu, and walked with the driver seat seat of the above E several times, and if the above F would restrain it, I would like to say “I would have ever ever ever ever ever,”

This outlined, “I am ....”, the body and arms of F with their body and arms were sealed.

Since then, the defendant left the above patrol car at the parking lot of the Bupyeong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Police Station, and went to the above E in person, and kept his body and boomed.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest and escort of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the circumstances of driving a drinking and notify the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of Trade Competition (Interference with the execution of each official duty).