However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant

A In May 15, 2015, the victim F, who was friendly as a post-school course in the office of Defendant E's operation located in the Gu Government-Si on May 15, 2015, lent KRW 30 million as the deposit to the Government-Si, in order to carry on the sales agency business of the complex apartment project in the city from the Gu Government-si G, and pays KRW 200,000 after the completion of the sales agency fee after six months.

Defendant B, who introduced himself/herself as a director of the above E, prepares an agreement to the same effect as “A” while making a false statement, and Defendant B, who introduced himself/herself as a director of the above E, will be paid in lieu of a payment in lieu of A.

“At the time of falsehoodation, the said investment share agreement was signed as a joint guarantor.”

However, at the time of fact, the Defendants did not acquire the right to operate the sales agency business, and there was no possibility of acquiring the right to operate the sales agency in the future because they did not enter into any agreement or contract with the operator of the apartment complex in the above state, which is the operator of the apartment complex in the above state, on the side of the development of the housing complex and the sales agency, and they did not have the intent or ability to carry out the sales agency business.

The Defendants conspired to induce the victim as above, and then acquired it through the post office account in the name of the Defendant A from the victim on the same day by obtaining 30 million won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements (the eight public trial date)

1. Statement made by the defendant B in the second public trial record;

1. Statement made by the witness F in the third public trial records;

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the suspect interrogation protocol (No. 26 list of evidence) to the prosecution against Defendant A

1. In each part of the statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol (No. 14, No. 20 of the evidence list) of each police officer against Defendant A

1. Part of the Defendants’ each part of the suspect interrogation protocol (No. 21 of the evidence list) against Defendant A.