The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 2, 2017, at around 20:40, the Defendant interfered with the business affairs of the victim’s restaurant business by drinking the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C, and drinking the e and drinking of the e and drinking of the e and drinking of the d” restaurant, making the e and drinking of a large sound, and exposing the plastic cups on the floor, thereby interfering with the victim’s restaurant business affairs.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the above time and place, was urged to return home from G police officers belonging to the Yasan Police Station F police box, who was called out after receiving a report at the above time and place, and was engaged in a bath, booming the shoulder of the above police officers, plucking up, plucking, plucking, and spreading several times, and interfered with the police officers’ performance of duties regarding the handling of the reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. For the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the scope of final sentence due to multiple concurrent crimes (one to one year) in the basic area (one type (one type of interference with the performance of official duties and one year and six months) (one type of interference with the performance of official duties) [the scope of recommended punishment] of the basic area (one type of interference with the performance of duties) [the scope of recommended punishment] of the basic area (one type of interference with the performance of duties] of the first type (one type or one year and six months) [the person with special sentencing] of the basic area (one type of interference with the performance of duties] of the first type of crime (one class or one year and six months]: Six months to two years [the decision of sentence] of six months [the defendant] committed a crime in the restaurant under the influence of alcohol and a series of crimes that are inferior to the quality of the crime, such as obstructing the dispatched police from the performance of official duties.

The degree of violence that the defendant used to police officers is not less severe, and the defendant continued to take a bath even after driving the police station, and damaged the equipment, etc., and the attitude after the crime was committed was also bad.