2. However, although the defendant's mistake was already considered in the court below, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case even though he was a repeated crime of the same kind (the subject of the crime of the crime of this case is a 'share purchase exclusive card' which is mainly the same as the crime of this case, and the defendant who had previously been living in the "debrising role" has the role of directly theft in this case, the crime of this case also led to the role of directly theft. The crime of this case of this case of this case of Suwon District Prosecutors' Office 2012, 3rd 743-793, 792, 794, 3rd 2012, 3rd 3rd 3rd 75793, 794, 200, 3rd 201, 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 74, 794, etc., 3rd 2013).

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.