However, the execution of imprisonment for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 9. 9. 17:21경 서울 강북구 B 앞길에서, ‘술에 취한 사람이 영업을 방해하고 있다’는 112신고를 받고 출동한 서울강북경찰서 C파출소 소속 경찰관 경사 D 및 경장 E이 신고자 등을 상대로 진술을 청취하고 있던 중, “나 깜방가면 되지 않냐.”고 말하면서 신고자에게 달려들었고, D이 이를 제지한 뒤 경범죄처벌법위반으로 통고처분서를 발부하자, "너희들 다 패버리겠다. 빵에 들어가면 되지."라고 말하면서 오른손 손바닥으로 D의 왼쪽 뺨 부위를 1회 때려 폭행하였다.

The Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police record regarding D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to image pictures damaged by violence;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that he/she commits an error, the fact that he/she again does not commit the same error, and the fact that he/she has no criminal record other than the one-time fine for drinking driving);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;