A. The sentence of the lower court (the imprisonment of eight months and the fine of five hundred thousand won) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The defendant needs to strictly punish the defendant if he/she repeatedly commits several offenses over a considerable period of time and considers the occurrence of many victims.

However, the defendant is a relatively young young youth with the 1997 life, and the future will not commit the crime of this case and observe the law and live there.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant is deemed appropriate; (b) the defendant has no criminal record more than a suspended sentence; (c) the defendant has character, conduct and environment of the defendant; (d) the motive, means, and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime were committed; and (e) the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed to be too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, the above argument by the defendant

3. In conclusion, since the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure, since the first head of the part of the first head of the 2016 High Order 1332 of the Criminal Procedure Act among the criminal facts of the judgment of the court below is obvious that the defendant is a clerical error in the judgment of February 4, 2016, “The defendant is obviously a clerical error in the judgment of February 24, 2016.”