beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2020.07.22 2020고단98

특수상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 18:20 on March 24, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 18:20, at the close of the residence of the Victim C (A) located in Chang Chang-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (b) around 13:00 on the same day, the Defendant took the Defendant’s residence as a large interest to the Defendant’s dwelling. In relation to the Defendant’s bathing, the Defendant 13:00 on the same day, she again brought the Defendant with the Defendant’s head hump on the ground that “(b) was boomed to me, and she would have her desire to do so; (c) she made the Defendant’s desire to do so; and (d) she again brought the Defendant with the victim’s head humf (18cm in length, total length, 90cm in length) which is a dangerous thing stored in the warehouse within the victim’s residence; and (d) she again brought the victim’s head humf as the victim’s loss.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things with the victim and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as snow boom and open wound around snow that require treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness C, D, E, and F;

1. Each police statement of C or D;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Medical certificates, certificates of hospitalization, and certificates of hospitalization and discharge;

1. 쇠ed photo;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was faced with a impregnishment report on the occurrence of the case, internal investigation report (on the spot and crime tool photo attached), investigation report (the investigation of the suspect's piracy), investigation report (the investigation of the suspect's piracy), and investigation report (the investigation of the suspect's piracy), and the defendant's defense counsel suffered a impregnishment by impreging the victim in the process of impreging the impregment in the process of impreging the impregment in the impregment, not impreging the victim's impregment toward the victim. However, the victim 1 is consistently getting back from the investigative agency to this court, and the victim was resisted by the defendant after her return to the house.