F) On May 31, 201, by lending money to Defendant B and G, the father of the Appointor C on May 31, 2011, the F prepared and delivered a loan certificate (Evidence A 1) to the effect that “F is paid KRW 40 million to the Appointor C at the time of termination of the claim provisional seizure case against claim No. 2010Kadan10431 on the joint and several guarantee of G and Defendant B, or on October 31, 2011, by a notary public on June 1, 2011.”

B. On the other hand, on May 10, 2010, the foregoing provisional seizure case for which C filed a claim against H as a creditor with H as KRW 600 million was revoked on July 17, 2013 (the case of revocation of provisional attachment No. 2013Kadan10294, Jun. 17, 2013).

C. Meanwhile, upon the death of F on January 19, 2014, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties D, and E inherited the property in 1/3 shares.

2. Determination on the claim for a loan of KRW 40 million

A. The plaintiff (Appointed Party) A made a decision on the cause of the claim.

As described in the paragraph, as F, lends KRW 40 million to the Selection under Defendant B’s joint and several sureties, Defendant B and Selection C have a joint and several obligation to repay this.

Defendant B’s joint and several sureties’s representative who is a joint and several sureties and a letter of loan worth KRW 40 million is recognized as above. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant B and the Appointed are jointly and severally liable for payment to Plaintiff B and the Appointed D and E according to their inheritance shares, barring any special circumstance.

B. As to the Defendant B’s assertion, Defendant B did not obtain the power of representation from the selected B, and the loan certificate and certificate.