If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 14:00 on September 23, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00, the Defendant: (b) in the Do field owned by the mother located in Ansan-si, Sinsan-si, the Defendant: (c) in the Do field owned by the head of Sinsan-si, the victim D (n, 61 years of age), who cultivated Dopoland by leasing the said Do field; (d) the head of his mother lent the victim, and (e) the payment of the retirement expenses and the payment of the Dopoto Dopos, which he borrowed to the victim, laid down the dubbbbing part of the victim’s right to the upper part of

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in written opinions;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse

1. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant merely carried the victim’s arms against the Defendant’s fating of fat, and there was no other fating on the victim’s chest. Therefore, the Defendant did not enter the fatus of the fatus.

2. The victim made a consistent and detailed statement that "the victim, at the time of the instant case, tried to cover the defendant's baby running even though the defendant's baby was sold, so the victim's house "," and that the defendant, who was next to the instant case, made a statement that "the victim's chest part of the victim's chest was about the elbow," (the investigative record 10 pages, 57 pages, and court statement)" was nine months after the date of the instant crime (as of September 23, 2010), but there were complaints in this case (as of June 28, 201), however, on September 29, 2010, when the victim was in close to the date of the crime, he received medical treatment of the chest on Sep. 29, 2010 and received medical treatment of the victim on Oct. 22, 2010, he did not appear to have received a direct examination or treatment of the victim on the right part of the victim, and did not have received a diagnosis or treatment (the victim).