except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 11, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement that “I would make payment on the date of payment of a promissory note after making the payment of the price as a promissory note on the part of the injured party E’s employees in the (State) D office operated by the Defendant in the (State) office of Kim Yong-si.”

However, since 2008, the Defendant had no intention or ability to settle this even if he received materials from the victims and issued promissory notes, such as the following: (a) since 2008, the financial situation of the Defendant has aggravated due to its business depression; (b) delinquent national taxes equivalent to 500 million won; and (c) delinquent national taxes equivalent to 30

After deceiving the victim, the Defendant received 21,584,120 kilograms from the victim on January 11, 201, the sum of market prices of 21,584,120, Switzerland 5,139km from the date and time to April 7, 2011, and was supplied with Switzerland 210,595,497 won in total over 13 times from the said date and time to April 7, 2011, and was supplied with ethyl over two occasions on January 31, 201 and April 5, 2011. However, a promissory note was delivered to the victim on payment of the total amount of five (208,592,820 won in total) of five (208,592,820 won in total, the due date of the payment of the promissory note, without paying it on May 17, 2011.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Partial entry of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The president of the sales office;

1. Copies of promissory notes;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a credit investigation report;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 (1) of the Election of Imprisonment or Imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account the fact that the victim has agreed smoothly with him/her and that he/she has no record of punishment for the same crime);