2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”) was a police officer appointed on December 12, 1989 and worked in the 112 comprehensive situation room of the Daegu Western Police Station from December 1, 2012 to the 112 comprehensive situation room of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station. On January 17, 2015, the deceased was found to have been dead at the family event after attending the family event and having returned to the house at around 07:0 on the following day.

B. On January 18, 2015, the Deceased is presumed to have died at around 01:0-02:00 on January 18, 2015. As a result of the autopsy, the private person is an acute heart color.

C. On September 22, 2015, the Plaintiff, as the wife of the Deceased, filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the Defendant, but the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement deliberated and decided on February 6, 2016, on the ground that the deceased’s “the deceased,” inherent risk factors in heart color and did not determine that the disease of a cardio-cerebrovascular has deteriorated due to his/her work, not falling under the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services

On July 6, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State. On December 22, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision non-conformity with the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that: (a) the Deceased cannot be deemed to have died of a disease directly caused by the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national defense, security, or the protection of the lives and property of the people; and (b) the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have died of a disease rapidly aggravated due to the outbreak of duties or training due

E. The plaintiff is entitled to the disposition of this case, hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case").

2) The Plaintiff filed the instant suit against the Plaintiff. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff did not dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 5 (which include each number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a day and night shift in the 112 comprehensive situation room.