beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.04.08 2013고단1609

상해등

Text

The punishment against the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment and a fine of five million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around February 17, 2012, the Defendant, as the chairperson of the Victim Mine-gun H, kept money deposited in the Gwangju Bank Account (Account Number I) in the name of the said H in business, he arbitrarily used the amount of KRW 95,000 deposited in the said account in personal form at “K” located in the Jeonnam-gun, Young-gun, Young-gun, and then embezzled the victim’s property in his business by using the same method nine times from around that time to March 22, 2012, as shown in attached Table 1, in the same manner.

2. Interference with business;

A. On April 10, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s regular meeting proceeding by force by failing to proceed with a disturbance, such as taking a bath and passing sound, at the meeting place of the said H, which is the chairperson, at the meeting place in Young-gun L, Jeonnam-gun.

B. As above, the Defendant, from the time of leaving the office of the chairman of the above H, received a request from M, etc., the new chairman, etc. to return the official seal, passbook, card, and documents, thereby obstructing the operation of the above H’s capital execution business by force, including the above H’s capital execution business, by failing to return them.

3. Around 14:00 on January 18, 2013, the Defendant destroyed and damaged knife the knife in office knife, on the ground that the NvictimO, etc. was manufactured in front of the Magwon Magwon located in the Seongdong-gun, Hongnam-gun, Hongnam-gun, and then 30 banners equivalent to the market price of 1.5 million won around the above place.

4. Around 08:40 on February 3, 2013, the injured Defendant stated that the P management office located in Young-gu L, Young-gu, Jeonnam-gun should continue to work even after the contract period has expired, and that “the injured Defendant shall be deemed to have been changed, and shall not be deemed to have interfered with his/her duties,” and that “the injured Party’s head shall be taken up and different from the injured Party’s head on the ground that the injured Party refused to work.”