자동차관리법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant operates the Ka Center in the name of “C” in Seopopo City B, and is a person engaged in the specialized motor vehicle maintenance business from the previous “motor vehicle portion maintenance business” on June 17, 2013 to the “motor vehicle specialized “motor vehicle maintenance business” (Presidential Decree No. 24620). A person who intends to operate a motor vehicle management business shall register with the head of the competent Si/Gun/Gu, and a specialized motor vehicle maintenance business operator shall not engage in the motor vehicle or presses pre-saleing of the body or presses. However, on February 20, 2014, the Defendant was unable to perform the vehicle maintenance business at the place of the said car center operated by himself/herself in violation of the scope of repair and maintenance of the 15,000 square meters of the Kapo City.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A statement that is written by the accuser;
1. Application of each detection photograph, motor vehicle management business registration certificate, and field photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant Article of facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment: Article 79 subparagraph 13 of the Automobile Management Act and Articles 53 (1) of the same Act;
1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;
1. A provisional payment order: A sentence shall be imposed as ordered by taking into account all the following circumstances with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: A favorable normal circumstance: (a) recognized the facts of a crime and reflects the fact; (b) appears not to have any profit gained from the crime of this case; (c) a normal circumstance unfavorable to the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding a fine: (a) there is a criminal record of the same kind of crime committed several times (including a fine of KRW 3 million on July 4, 201; and (d) a fine of KRW 1.5 million on May 9, 2006): It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that the circumstances leading to a crime, the circumstances after a crime,