아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강요행위등)등
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of four years and six months.
The defendant shall be ordered to complete 120 hours of sexual assault treatment programs.
Criminal facts
1. Cases 2013 Highis352;
A. The Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Good Offices, etc.), proposed to divide and use the money by using the term “term remainder” in the meaning of sexual traffic to F (F, 16 years of age), G (n, 15 years of age), which means sexual traffic, as well as H recruited to do a job of setting the time and place for sexual traffic by printing with a man who wants sexual purchase through the Internet.
H around April 6, 2013, at the “Jel” guest room located in Gwangju Mine-gu I, by accessing the Internet hosting site with the ID and password known by the Defendant, H puts into the hosting room, stating “Saby 21, 168, 50, 50, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 100, 100, 100, 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, and00,000,000,000, and00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,
In addition, from November 2012, 2012, the Defendant and H had F and G engaged in sexual intercourses with an unspecified male who wants to be “conditionon” by the aforementioned method from the early police officer (H from the beginning of April 2013 to the end of May 2013) and from the beginning of May 2013, the Defendant and H obtained a total of approximately KRW 57,010,000 (the benefit of H’s participation is KRW 13,160,000) by obtaining KRW 10,000 per week an average of 5 days per week, 4-5 hours per day, and 10,000 won per hour.
As a result, the defendant and H have arranged the act of buying sex of juveniles as a business.
B. On February 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Coercive Conduct, etc.) committed a sexual traffic at any scoo near the “Lel” located in Gwangju Mine-gu, the Defendant agreed that the victim F, who had been engaged in sexual traffic from the early November 2012 patrolmen, shall go to the Defendant’s place of her death, and that “the victim shall go to the Defendant’s place of her death.”