A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Defendant

B The application of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Defendant

On October 10, 2012, A was operating with a high-priced wheel, wheel, etc. purchased from a foreign country by using a wheel, pans, etc. from which he/she was in possession of the GW car, A had a traffic accident that conflicts with H driver's low-pollution car while driving the said BMW car. In this case, in the case of a general traffic accident, a vehicle insurance company will compensate for the vehicle according to the vehicle repair estimate and pay the transportation cost in accordance with the car rental cost specification until the repair is completed, but in the case of a traffic accident involving a high-class external car, such as the above BM passenger car owned by the Defendant, it is difficult to predict the accurate repair cost because it is difficult to expect the repair cost because parts, etc. used for remodeling are to be purchased again from a foreign country, and as long as the repair period extends, it is difficult to expect the repair cost to increase the cost of the vehicle directly to the other party to the accident, and thus, it is also difficult to expect the repair cost to be paid by the other party to the accident.

Accordingly, Defendant A marks the vehicle that tried to change the vehicle while operating an external vehicle, which has been remodeled as a high-priced part, and pretended to have been involved in the traffic accident by causing the collision with the vehicle as it is. In fact, Defendant A has attempted to acquire money from the automobile insurance company that has joined the other vehicle in the name of the non-repair cost and transportation cost, even though it is not necessary to repair the vehicle or it is thought that it does not properly repair the vehicle.

Defendant

A around 18:55 on December 6, 2012, at the inner circulation of the river located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 2012.