However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 23, 2015, from around 03:00 to 04:15 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by putting food to the floor of the instant restaurant, putting him/her on the floor, putting him/her out a bath, putting him/her out a bath, and putting him/her out out of the restaurant, while having no food massage in the victim D (n, 62 years of age), and the victim E (n, 59 years of age) restaurant work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against D or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of damage;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination on the application of the O sentencing guidelines for the reasons of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation: The scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines for the applicable O sentencing: consideration of all circumstances, including the fact that there is no criminal history exceeding the fine in the basic area (from June to June) of the basic area (the act of interference with business).