도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. There is no significant change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing favorable to the defendant after the judgment of the court below.
In light of the following facts: (a) the Defendant was punished four times in 204, 201, 2011, 2012, and 2017 due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act; and (b) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2017; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the suspended sentence period; and (d) the terms and conditions of sentencing specified in the instant records and pleadings and the reasons for sentencing of the lower judgment, even if considering the circumstances required by the Defendant, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.
Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.