However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is in a de facto marital relationship from January 2014 with the victim B (nive, 38 years of age).

1. Around May 28, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc., damage, etc. to property) and damaged the victim’s property by making it possible for the Defendant to take a dangerous object (40 cm of the head of the watch and 35 cm in total length) which is a dangerous object stored in the Defendant’s vehicle (35 cm in front of the 1st 302 dwelling space) on the ground that the victim living together, who was under the influence of alcohol, was not opening the door in front of the 1st 302 dwelling space, around May 28, 2014.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.) heard the victim’s speech that no door is opened from the victim who was inside the entrance, which is a dangerous object, at the time, and at the place, at the time, paragraph (1) of the same Article, and at the time and place, the victim saw the victim as “the victim who was in flight of the entrance, with a view to hacking him/her,” and continued to open the door to the victim, thereby threatening the victim

3. The Defendant, at the time and place of the foregoing paragraph (1) above, listens to the horses of the police officer, such as D Zone E, etc., who was dispatched after receiving the report of 112 from the 10th of the D District Station, who was sent to the police officer, who “if you get off or get off,” and the said police officer “if you are dead,” shall be discarded.

The match is called the match.

Doeson the inside and outside of the Republic of Korea be its superior, as close as:

V. L. H. H. H. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L

Accordingly, the defendant, carrying dangerous objects and threatened police officers, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to B, F, and G;

1. Each statement of E and H;

1. Seizure records;

1. The value of the goods subject to the investigation report;