However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, from February 2, 2018 to May 2018, 2018, was friendly with the victim B (59 years of age), and the Defendant, on the ground that the victim did not abide by the promise regarding the operation of the main store to the Defendant and did not drinking the victim himself/herself.

At around 12:30 on October 1, 2018, the Defendant purchased gasoline 1.5 liters from the D gas station located in Sweak-si, which he prepared to purchase it, opened a twn gate which was not set up in the victim’s residence, and intruded before the entrance, and threatened the victim with the victim with the victim’s “Isker’s house. Isn’s house flick, Isn’t flick. Isn’t flick, Isn’s house. Isn’t like the victim’s body and its floor, Isn’t flick, Isn’t flick, Isn’s house.”

Accordingly, the defendant prepared fire prevention for the purpose of setting fire to a structure used as a residence of the victim, and invaded upon the victim's residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Legal and chemical appraisal statement;

1. Recording notes;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 175 of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 175 of the Criminal Act, Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of intrusion and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the nature and risk of the instant crime, circumstances of the crime, etc. shall be considered; however, there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and the victim B.