beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.19 2016가합1958

양수금

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to the Defendant A’s KRW 1,269,541,702 and KRW 615,482,114 among them:

B. The defendant A shall be jointly and severally.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. G (hereinafter “G”) was a nonprofit corporation established under the Credit Unions Act on July 9, 197, and was declared bankrupt by the Gwangju District Court on May 2, 2003, and the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy on the same day.

B. Defendant A and the networkF served as the following executive officers and employees in G.

1) Defendant A: A managing director from June 20, 1986 to June 30, 1995, and from July 1, 1995 to May 6, 1999: managing director from January 1, 1997 to January 20, 1999.

C. Defendant B is a credit guarantee which entered into a contract for fidelity guarantee with the content that the term of the credit guarantee for the networkF is set from July 1, 1996 to June 30, 199 and that the networkF would inflict damage on G when it works in G.

The deceased on February 25, 2002, the deceased on February 25, 2002, and the Defendant C/D, the spouse of the deceased, and the Defendant D/E inherited the deceased’s property 2/7 each by 2/7. The Defendant C/D and E filed a petition for adjudication on inheritance recognition with the Gwangju District Court’s Netcheon Branch 2002-Ma502, and the report was accepted on November 10, 2003.

E. The Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation filed a lawsuit against the Defendants, etc. on January 26, 2006 against G by filing a claim for compensation for damages incurred by G with the Gwangju District Court 2003Ga2636, 2014Gahap1210 (combined). On January 26, 2006, the above court ordered the Defendant A to compensate for damages incurred by G due to the illegal handling of H’s loan, I’s illegal loan, J’s loan to non-members, loans to non-members, K’s Embezzlement’s Embezzlement’s embezzlement, accounting settlement, and illegal dividend within the scope of property inherited from the networkF, jointly and severally with the Defendant C, D, and E to the extent of property inherited from the networkF, order the payment of the amount equivalent to 10% of the net amount of liability for each embezzlement of Defendant C, D, and E, as the credit guarantee of the networkF, and jointly and severally with Defendant C, E, and E, and the amount equivalent to 10% of the net amount of liability.