beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.12.20 2017고단484

사기등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the defendants, two years from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

After the Defendants were sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act by the victim D’s children, and become aware of the fact that they were confined to the astronomical Prison, the Defendants may parole the victims’ children by acting as if they were related to F and requesting the F to release the victims by committing the act as if they were related to F.

In order to induce victims to receive money, there was a conspiracy to receive money.

Defendant

A on March 25, 2016, the Defendant called the victim on the influencies and called “B, who is a son, I had been on duty in the Ministry of Justice, this Section has been still in active service, and F will have been in active service, and I would be able to be paroled through B, and this is first of all, 5 million won and 5 million won when parole is finally released.” The Defendants requested the victim and the victim to pay the money in the name of expenses, “The Defendant would have been able to make it possible to know about the parole of son through her children,” and the latter would have been able to be released by her through B.

However, Defendant B did not have worked at the Ministry of Justice, and even if the Defendants received money from the injured party, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to release the injured party’s children.

The Defendants: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received the delivery of KRW 3 million in cash from the damaged party; and (c) Defendant A transferred the victim’s residence to Daejeon-gu G along with the victim’s residence; and (d) received KRW 2 million in the said place.

As a result, the Defendants received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting or arranging the affairs handled by the public officials at the same time by deceiving the victims by deceiving them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each of the Defendants’ respective legal statements.