도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant, who recognized the facts charged, runs against the Defendant.
However, after around 200, the Defendant was punished for four times as a drunk driving and a unlicensed driving, and on September 10, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months as of September 10, 2009, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years as of May 17, 201 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years as of May 17, 201.
In full view of the statutory penalty prescribed by the Road Traffic Act, the punishment imposed on a similar case, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and pleadings, such as equity, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the lower court’s sentence is unreasonable.
3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.