beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.06.12 2017가단31841

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts are: (a) around 2014, the Plaintiff lent the answer in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, to install automatic closing and closing sunlightes (hereinafter “instant summer”); and (b) the Defendant, along with his employees, cultivated spores from the instant summer; and (c) from around 7:0:0 on April 22, 2017, the fact that the Defendant installed containers on the land adjoining to the instant summer does not conflict between the parties.

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendant: (a) caused electricity to use the measuring instruments connected to all of the instant licenses in order to perform container installation work; (b) left alone and connected electricity to the other terminals; and (c) caused the Defendant’s allegation that the temperature control device of the instant licenses was not supplied with electricity; (d) thereby, the Defendant did not affect the Plaintiff’s demand for damages on the ground that the temperature control device of the instant licenses did not extend to five hours before the Plaintiff was discovered and died at the wind where five hours passed from the date of automatic opening and closing until the Plaintiff was discovered. The Defendant did not affect the Plaintiff’s demand for damages on the land of KRW 152,550,00,00 for the three-year period, which was incurred in the restoration of Do trees. Therefore, the Defendant did not affect the Plaintiff’s demand for damages on the land of KRW 152,50,000,000 due to the above tort, and did not affect the Plaintiff’s internal intervals.

B. We examine the determination of the cause of the claim. The fact that the Defendant installed a container by connecting the electric wires to the measuring instruments connected to all of the instant cargo stations does not conflict between the parties, but evidence A Nos. 1 through 6.