Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On December 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) decided to receive KRW 200,00 from the victim on the condition that the victim B, who was in an influent female and obscene video call, deleted the Defendant’s contact information secured by the photographer; (b) however, the victim’s contact with the victim by delivering only KRW 100,000,00; and (c) did not agree to the effect that the victim would disclose the video data to the Defendant’s will receive the remainder of KRW 100,000.

At around 06:10 on January 3, 2015, the Defendant sent a notice to DPC room located in Ansan-si, Masan-si, on the part of the victim’s NPC, stating that “The contact point of Dong image franc shall have a low shot, so it shall not be able to spread any time, because she has a low shot, and he shall be able to spread the video data against the victim’s will without paying the money.” In addition, the Defendant, without paying the money, she puts heavy amount of video data to the victim’s will spread the video data.

The Defendant, as such, was delivered KRW 100,00 to the victim on January 3, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of the report on damage filed in B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes stating e-mail protocol;

1. The selection of a fine under Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 350 (1) of the same Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine - The selection of a fine shall be made in consideration of the circumstances leading to the instant

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the custody of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.