However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Power of crime] On May 19, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in the support of the Suwon Frigwon method.

[2] On June 30, 2020, under the influence of alcohol level of 0.25% among blood alcohol level, the Defendant driven B rocketing car at a section of about 50 km from the front of the Cheongcheon-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, to the road front of about 22 km of Pyeongtaek-si-si, Gyeonggi-do.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving regulations not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement report on the circumstances of the driver placed in driving and notification of the result of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (referring to the previous review of criminal history);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Comprehensive consideration of the fact that an order to attend a lecture has the same record of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and re-offending is conducted despite the same record of sentencing, the blood alcohol concentration is very high, the driving distance is longer, and it is against the law.