[손해배상청구사건][고집1966민,291]
Senior Ships and Victims' Negligence
Since the appointment and search winner is in the position to direct and supervise the driver's disease in accordance with the internal regulations of the military, the failure to stop the operation of the driver's disease is caused by negligence.
Articles 763 and 393 of the Civil Act
Supreme Court Decision 67Da1230 Decided August 22, 1967 (Supreme Court Decision 146Da146, Supreme Court Decision 15Du243, Supreme Court Decision 763(81)582, Supreme Court Decision 763Da1230 Decided August 22, 196)
Plaintiff 1 and one other
Countries
Seoul Central District Court (65Ga4558) in the first instance trial
The original judgment shall be modified as follows:
The defendant shall pay 1,650,00 won to the plaintiff 1, and 850,000 won to the plaintiff 2, and 5% interest per annum from June 24, 1965 to the full payment.
The remaining claims of the plaintiff et al. are dismissed.
The litigation costs shall be divided into three parts through the first and second trials, and one of them shall be borne by the plaintiff, etc. and the remainder at the defendant's expense.
The part concerning plaintiffs 2 in the text of this paragraph may be provisionally executed.
The plaintiff et al. shall pay to the plaintiff 1 2,901,095 won 53 won, 1,450,547 won to the plaintiff 2, and 1,450,547 won, and the amount at the rate of 5 percent per annum from the following day of service of a copy soar to the full payment.
The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the defendant and a declaration of provisional execution, and the defendant sought a judgment of dismissal of the plaintiff such as the plaintiff.
The defendant shall revoke the part against the defendant in the original judgment.
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
All the costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiff et al., and the plaintiff et al. filed a judgment dismissing the appeal.
성립에 다툼이 없는 갑 1 내지 5호증, 동 6호증의 1 내지 17, 동 7 및 8호증의 기재에 원심증인 소외 1의 증언을 종합하면 망 소외 2는 부산대학교 의과대학을 졸업하고 1962.7.14. 군의무관 중위로 입대하여 보병 8사단 21연대 3대대 의무지대에 근무하던중 1962.12.3. 의사국가고시에 합격하여 의사면허를 받은 사실, 원고 1은 동 망인의 아버지, 원고 2는 동 망인의 어머니로서 동 망인의 공동 재산상속인이 되는 사실, 피고 예하에 보병 8사단 21연대 3대대 의무지대소속 병장 소외 1은 동 지대소속 2호 2/4톤 짚차의 운전업무에 종사하던 자로서 1963.11.21.17:40경 피해자 소외 2 외 2명을 동 차량에 태우고 경기 연천군 연천면 현가리 5반 앞 노상을 연천 방향으로 시속 약 60키로미텨 속도로 도로 중앙부를 운행중 약 10미터 전방에서 오는 소속 불명 미군 2½톤 차량을 발견하였는바 이러한 경우 자동차운전업무에 종사하는 자는 속도를 줄이고 서서히 운행하면서 앞에서 오는 차량을 피하여 안전한 방향으로 운행하여야 할 업무상의 주의의무가 있음에도 불구하고 소외 1은 출발하기 전에 먹은 술로 인하여 약간의 취기가 있었던 관계로 이러한 주의의무를 다하지 아니하고 만연히 같은 속도로 운행을 계속하다가 앞에서 오는 차량과 접근되자 갑자기 급부레익을 사용함과 동시에 핸들을 오른쪽으로 꺽은 결과 과속의 탄력으로 차체가 왼쪽으로 한바퀴 굴러 배수로에 전복되는 순간 위 차량에 타고 있는 사람중의 최상급자로서 조수석에 타고 있던 소외 2가 차량의 오른쪽문으로 떨어지게 되고 그로 인하여 동인으로 하여금 두개골 골절상으로 현장에서 즉사케 한 사실을 인정할 수 있으며 달리 반증없으므로 피고는 위 공무원의 직무집행에 제하여 소외 2 및 원고등에게 가한 손해를 배상할 책임이 있다 할 것이다.
Therefore, in light of the whole purport of the parties' arguments, Nonparty 2 was a doctor's license holder on July 14, 1962, and Nonparty 2 was removed from 10 on September 27, 1935. Nonparty 2 was healthy male at 28 years of age and the average male life of 28 years of age was 31.47 years of age, and Nonparty 2 was 100,000 won of 20,000 won of 10,000 won of 20,000 won of 20,000 won of 20,000 won of 20,000 won of 20,000 won of 20,00 won of 30,000 won of 20,00 won of 20,000 won of 20,000 won of 30,000 won of 20,00 won of 10,000 won of 20,00 won of 2.
Next, since the plaintiff et al. suffered a lot of mental pain due to the sudden death of the non-party 2, the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money to the non-party 2. Considering the relationship with the plaintiff et al. and all other circumstances revealed in the arguments, consolation money of the plaintiff et al. is recognized to be reasonable in 50,000 won, respectively.
Therefore, the claim of the plaintiff et al. is legitimate only to the extent that the plaintiff 1 is entitled to receive an amount equivalent to five percent per annum from June 24, 1965 to the full payment rate of 850,000 won, which is clearly indicated that the plaintiff 2 is entitled to receive an amount of money from June 24, 1965 to 850,000 won, and the remaining part is unfair. Accordingly, the original judgment that differs from this conclusion is partially unfair, and the defendant's lawsuit is justified to the extent that it is reasonable, so it is so decided as per Disposition by the application of Articles 386, 96, 89, and 199 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Judges Choi Jong-young-ho (Presiding Judge)