However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 15:40 on November 21, 2018, the Defendant committed a crime of assault, such as taking once into account the left side of E, the F’s left side kick at the Damina room operated by Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station G police box who received a report 112 and called out after the receipt of the said report, and the Defendant took a bath to the said H, and the Defendant took a bath to the said H one time by taking the part of the H’s entrance into the front left part of the knick, and humping the H with the upper part of the knick.

As such, the Defendant assaulted police officers H and interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning H’s crime prevention, investigation, maintenance of order, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the visit to the scene of violence, and a report on internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [the range of the recommended sentence] of the obstruction of performance of official duties [the category 1] of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the special person concerned]: Where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (the scope of the recommended area and the recommended sentence] of mitigation area, one month to eight months of imprisonment;

2. Determination of sentence shall be made in full view of the circumstances under which the defendant was committed, the extent of damage, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and criminal records, which form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case.

Unfavorable circumstances: A normal condition that the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is a crime that undermines the function of the state's legal order and requires strict punishment: the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's wrong, and the degree of interference with this violence and official duties is not severe, and it seems that the defendant's punishment was caused by contingent crimes at the time.