2. The judgment below's punishment is too unreasonable in light of the following facts: (a) the Defendant made confession of the facts charged in this case; (b) the Defendant has no record of punishment other than a fine; (c) the Defendant has been punished by age of 68; (d) the Defendant is not healthy; and (e) economic circumstances are not good; (c) the offense in this case is deemed to be insulting to the victim, who is a police officer in charge of his duties, and thus, the nature of the offense is not easy; and (d) the victim seems to have caused considerable humiliation and humiliation due to the Defendant's abusive theory; and (e) other sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, are considered. Therefore, the Defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.